# Levi's AI Partnership: A Step Towards Diversity or Just Greenwashing?
Written on
Chapter 1: Overview of Levi's AI Collaboration
Levi Strauss & Co., a renowned clothing brand, has recently formed a partnership with the digital fashion studio Lalaland.ai. This collaboration aims to utilize artificial intelligence to create models for their marketing efforts.
The motivation behind this initiative appears straightforward: optimizing production costs and enhancing profit margins through advertising. This strategy is reminiscent of the early pandemic days when brands adapted by engaging virtual influencers to circumvent various restrictions.
AI-generated avatars offer brands a plethora of advantages; they are immune to illness, punctual, and available around the clock. Essentially, brands can replicate human attributes without the associated drawbacks. However, does this mean they are abandoning traditional advertising methods entirely? Not necessarily. Instead, they are capitalizing on opportunities while others remain hesitant about the implications of this trend on their businesses.
Section 1.1: The Context of the Partnership
To better understand Levi's collaboration with Lalaland.ai, it is important to note that the studio specializes in creating hyperrealistic models showcasing a variety of body types, ages, and skin tones. Other major brands, such as Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, have also engaged with this innovative studio. Levi's asserts that its commitment to diversity will extend beyond using AI models, aiming to collaborate with content creators that reflect their diverse consumer demographic. However, the contradiction arises when considering the reliance on AI models instead of hiring real models, makeup artists, and photography personnel. This shift towards AI representation may signal a broader trend within the industry to replace human involvement with artificial alternatives.
Subsection 1.1.1: Diversity Claims Under Scrutiny
Critics have raised significant concerns about Levi's claims of utilizing AI for promoting diversity. The brand's assertion has faced backlash, as many question how AI can genuinely enhance diversity. AI models, in the true sense, lack inherent diversity—they are products of algorithms shaped by the data they are trained on. If the training data is not diverse, neither are the resulting models. Moreover, AI-generated representations often depict an idealized standard of beauty, potentially alienating individuals who do not conform to these norms. Furthermore, this shift raises ethical concerns regarding job security for human creatives, suggesting a move primarily aimed at cutting costs and maximizing profits. Ultimately, the utilization of AI models does not address the systemic issues that contribute to the lack of diversity in the fashion industry; instead, it risks simplifying diversity to mere visual representation rather than acknowledging deeper, systemic challenges.
Section 1.2: Response to the Backlash
In light of the criticisms, Levi’s has issued a statement in response to concerns highlighted in an article by PetaPixel regarding their partnership with Lalaland.ai. The brand clarified that AI-generated models are not intended to replace traditional photoshoots or negatively affect job opportunities for human models, makeup artists, or photographers. A company spokesperson emphasized that the goal of the partnership is to enhance human modeling efforts and cultivate a more personalized and inclusive shopping experience for customers. The spokesperson also reiterated Levi's commitment to diversity, assuring that they will continue to hire a wide range of human models that reflect their diverse consumer base. Trials for this partnership are scheduled for later this year, and the company will evaluate the future application of AI based on feedback and key insights.
Chapter 2: Implications of AI in Fashion
The second video, titled "Levi's to Use AI Models to Increase Diversity Instead of Hiring POC," explores the implications of Levi's decision to rely on AI-generated models rather than hiring people of color. The discussion delves into the ethical ramifications of this approach and its potential impact on the industry as a whole.