The Dismal Reality of Crypto Investments on Republic.com
Written on
Chapter 1: The Grim Statistics of Crypto Investments
Recent data reveals that a staggering 71% of cryptocurrency investments made through Republic.com have resulted in nearly complete losses within the first day of trading. Alarmingly, it appears that 100% of all token investments on this platform are also trending toward substantial losses.
A notable incident that sparked outrage within the Republic community involved a recent initial coin offering (ICO) called Parastate. Upon its launch, the token plummeted over 90% on its first trading day, leaving investors with almost nothing. Weeks later, it remains in a state of decline with negligible trading volume. This situation was exacerbated by the fact that the leader of Parastate had a history of unsuccessful crypto projects, and the business plan presented before the launch was fundamentally flawed. They managed to sell tens of millions of tokens without generating any new demand, which is a fundamental misstep in market dynamics. Even for those unfamiliar with cryptocurrency, the principles of supply and demand are straightforward and critical for success.
In light of these failures, I found myself questioning the overall performance of ICOs on Republic. To date, there have been seven ICOs listed on the platform, which collectively raised over $55 million from both accredited and non-accredited investors. Disturbingly, all seven of these projects saw investors facing paper losses within the first week. Moreover, five of these offerings resulted in near-total losses, totaling over $39 million. The remaining two projects are currently locked for several more months or years and are either trading at or below the original investment price, with a downward trend.
While equity crowdfunding and venture capital inherently carry high failure rates, they typically involve a process of growth using the funds raised, eventually failing due to an inability to secure a sufficient market share. This process often spans years and includes varying degrees of success. Even in the event of a company’s failure, investors holding preferred stock or convertible notes often receive partial refunds. In contrast, more than 70% of these ICOs are failing on their very first day, and those that haven’t yet failed are still on a path toward loss.
My concern lies not with Republic’s equity crowdfunding, which appears to function adequately, but rather with its cryptocurrency offerings, which are evidently underperforming.
Section 1.1: A Call for Change in Vetting Processes
The consistent trend of failure among these offerings indicates a pressing need for reform in the vetting process. With over 70% of these investments failing right at launch, it raises questions about the efficacy of their selection criteria. When every single investment is poised for a near-total loss, it indicates a fundamental flaw in their methodology.
It's important to note that these losses are not limited to retail investors; a significant portion of the funding came from accredited investors. This suggests serious issues with the quality of projects being approved, the structure of the offerings, and other underlying factors. My intention is not to propose solutions for Republic but to ensure that potential investors are fully aware of the stark realities surrounding these projects.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Downward Trajectory of Various Tokens
Here’s a brief overview of several tokens and their current standings:
- Cere Network – Initially raised $28 million in tokens and an additional $26 million through a Simple Agreement for Future Equity (SAFE). However, the token’s value plummeted over 50% on its first day and has since dropped nearly 99%.
- ParaState – As previously mentioned, investors lost approximately 90% of the $8.2 million raised within the first day.
- WitNet – This project raised $1 million in 2018 but only listed its tokens three years later. After launch, it fell over 90% in value, leaving investors stuck.
- Props Token – Similar in structure to WitNet, Props raised $1 million and faced an immediate drop, now sitting over 90% below its offering price.
- Ratio Finance – This token raised over $2 million, launched at a price point between $1 and $1.50, and subsequently fell to around $1, with an 18-month lock-up period for investors.
- Gari – This offering, launched in January 2022, initially dipped below the purchase price but has since returned close to the original investment, although it is still under a lock-up period.
- Coinvest – The only token to halt trading completely, investors purchased tokens for $0.70, only to see the price drop to $0.20 on launch day, resulting in a significant loss.
Chapter 2: The Importance of Awareness in Crypto Investments
Investors must remain vigilant and informed about the realities of cryptocurrency investments, particularly in high-risk environments like ICOs. While not every token will follow the unfortunate trajectory of its predecessors, many have demonstrated poor performance post-launch, underscoring the need for potential investors to conduct thorough research before committing funds.
In conclusion, while the cryptocurrency landscape can offer substantial rewards, it is fraught with risks that demand careful consideration and awareness.