The Impact of Acknowledgment

Do you think the Pentagon’s release of the footage lends more credibility to TTSA?

Certainly, it has bolstered our mission, which emphasizes transparency and the need for open conversations about a subject often surrounded by stigma. In just the past year, the Navy has admitted that the videos are genuine UAPs, not merely “unidentified aircraft.” This is a significant achievement for public discourse; we can now discuss UAPs without resorting to stereotypes like little green men.

The reality of these videos is now indisputable. The government has officially confirmed their existence. However, the Pentagon has yet to clarify what these UAPs actually are. This cautious approach is prudent, as we currently lack the data to make definitive conclusions.

Moreover, Congress has been briefed on the footage, and even the President of the United States has remarked, “It’s a hell of a video.” This reflects the changing dynamics of the discussion. Historically, this subject was marginalized; now, it’s a viable topic for conversation, potentially even in Congress.

Some astrophysicists suggest that these phenomena could be atmospheric effects or issues with fighter jet display systems. How do you respond to this?

This was among the first avenues we explored—examining all conceivable aircraft, drones, and other aerial vehicles. While one could attribute certain phenomena to infrared flares or reflections, such explanations do not account for eyewitness accounts or radar detections. You cannot lock onto an atmospheric disturbance; that simply doesn’t add up.

The Future of UAP Discussions

These videos have sustained significant public interest since the New York Times brought them to light in 2017. How do you plan to keep the conversation alive?

I’m thrilled about our upcoming artificial intelligence integration through our mobile app, SCOUT, and our database, VAULT, which will store and analyze the information we gather.

We have invested considerable effort into developing this capability. Anyone with a smartphone will be promptly notified if something unusual appears in the sky. This information will be processed using cutting-edge AI technology. Is it an approaching airplane, a planet, or perhaps a weather balloon? All these possibilities will be filtered in real-time.

We are entering an era where everyone can act as an intelligence collector. With devices capable of recording audio and video, if enough people are observing the skies, we may uncover astonishing evidence collectively.

What might motivate the government to “cover up” the existence of UAPs?

I prefer not to delve into conspiracy theories. I no longer represent the U.S. government, so I can’t speak on their behalf. However, it is essential for the government to provide answers, especially regarding national security. If a foreign entity possesses advanced technology that outmatches ours, it’s the intelligence community's responsibility to identify and assess it. When something can navigate U.S. airspace and outmaneuver our conventional aircraft, it raises alarm bells. Publicizing such capabilities is not advisable.

Historically, consider the U-2 and SR-71 spy plane operations. Initially, the U-2 was deployed over Soviet territory without acknowledgment until one was shot down. Only then did they reveal America’s covert capabilities.

Can you elaborate on TTSA’s recent contract with the Army Futures Command? Could this shift your relationship with the Pentagon?

TTSA is comprised of former government and military intelligence professionals. Many ask, “Why work with the government?” It’s in our DNA. Collaborating with the U.S. Army and other governmental sectors is not inherently negative. Ultimately, I don’t want to be the last person in the Pentagon insisting that these phenomena are not real.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.