The Collapse of Terra/Luna: A Cautionary Tale in Crypto
Written on
Chapter 1: The Terra/Luna Saga
In the wake of the Ukraine conflict, I had taken a step back from discussing cryptocurrency, having faced criticism for my views on its relevance in such crises. However, the shocking collapse of Terra and Luna is a pivotal moment in crypto history that prompted me to break my silence. As I draft this piece, numerous reports are surfacing on various platforms, including Medium.
For those not closely monitoring the cryptocurrency landscape, here’s a brief overview of the events surrounding the collapse, their significance, and the future implications for the crypto market.
What Occurred on May 9, 2022?
The cryptocurrency at the center of this debacle is known as USTerra (UST). The accompanying chart illustrates the catastrophic fall of UST, which lost its dollar peg and plummeted to as low as $0.04 by May 13, 2022. As I write, it is trading around $0.19 against the US dollar.
Such sharp declines—where a crypto asset loses 90% of its value in mere days—aren't unusual in the volatile crypto market. However, when the asset in question is a "stablecoin," the stakes are significantly higher.
Understanding Stablecoins
To grasp the Terra collapse, we must first define what a stablecoin is. Unlike traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum, UST was designed to maintain a stable value relative to a fiat currency—in this case, the US dollar.
Stablecoins were developed to address the inherent volatility of cryptocurrencies; their value should remain consistent with the currency they are pegged to. UST, created by Terraform Labs in Singapore in 2018 and led by South Korean founder Do Kwon, was pegged to the US dollar.
While UST is not the only stablecoin, with Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) being the largest by market capitalization, its unique features set it apart. Tether claims to back its tokens with equivalent USD assets, although it has faced legal scrutiny for its asset claims. Conversely, Circle, which issues USDC, provides audited reports confirming its backing by real-world assets.
In contrast, UST was classified as an algorithmic stablecoin, relying not on physical assets but on a complex protocol to maintain its stability. This mechanism, which is intricate enough to require specialized knowledge for full understanding, uses a combination of code, community involvement, and economic incentives.
The first video titled "HUGE CRYPTO CRASH: -99% In ONE DAY.. Is Crypto Dead?" delves into the fallout from the Terra collapse, exploring the implications of such a drastic market event.
The Terra Ecosystem: Terra and Luna
The Terra Protocol consists of two tokens: Terra and Luna. According to the official documentation, UST's value was maintained through its counterpart, Luna. To illustrate, think of the Terra economy as two interconnected pools: one for Terra and one for Luna. The protocol incentivized users to either mint or burn tokens to stabilize the price of Terra.
To clarify, if UST began trading below $1, arbitrageurs would buy it at a discount and exchange it for Luna, bringing UST’s price back up. However, when UST's value dropped significantly, the system began to fail.
The Anchor Protocol: A Double-Edged Sword
The Anchor Protocol, part of the Terra ecosystem, allowed UST holders to earn nearly 20% APY on their deposits. This high yield attracted massive amounts of UST—prior to May 7, 2022, Anchor held $14 billion in UST. As withdrawals surged, the total plummeted, akin to a bank run, leaving the UST peg vulnerable.
The Flaws of Terra and Luna
For UST to maintain its value, Luna must also remain stable. However, when both assets began to decline simultaneously, investors lost confidence, leading to a cascade of sell-offs. The price of Luna crashed, and as UST de-pegged, holders rushed to exit, creating a death spiral for both tokens.
By May 9, 2022, the circulating supply of Luna was 343 million tokens; it has since skyrocketed to 6.5 trillion tokens, illustrating the catastrophic inflation that ensued.
The second video titled "UST Death Spiral (BTC $30,000)" analyzes the dynamics of the Terra collapse and its broader market implications.
Conspiracy Theories and Speculations
Rumors abound regarding a coordinated attack on Terra and Luna, with some theorizing it might have been orchestrated. The narrative gained traction after reports surfaced that the Luna Foundation Guard had made significant withdrawals just before the market crash.
Did these actions trigger the collapse? The connection remains speculative but concerning.
A Late Attempt at Recovery
In response to the crisis, Do Kwon announced plans to back UST with Bitcoin, purchasing $1.6 billion worth in April 2022. However, this effort proved insufficient as the market continued to spiral downward. The unfolding drama echoes past financial crises, highlighting the inherent risks in complex financial engineering.
Key Takeaways
The collapse of Terra and Luna serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of algorithmic stablecoins. It underscores the necessity for stablecoins to be backed by tangible assets. Increased regulatory scrutiny is likely on the horizon as the crypto industry grapples with the fallout from this incident.
For those who feel overwhelmed by the complexities of the crypto space—rightly so—exercise caution and refrain from making high-stakes investments in areas you don't fully understand. The crypto landscape is rife with risks and deceit; remember, "Code is Law."
If You Know Someone Affected by the Terra-Luna Collapse...
Individuals who invested heavily in Luna or Terra have expressed devastating sentiments on platforms like Reddit, with some contemplating desperate actions. It is crucial to prioritize life over financial assets and to reach out to those in distress. Your support could make a significant difference.
Disclaimer and Disclosure: This article does not constitute legal or financial advice. Trading in crypto assets carries significant risk; please conduct your own research before proceeding. The author holds various crypto tokens at the time of writing.